Performance Analysis of DSR and TORA Model Routing Protocols In Vehicular Ad Hoc Network

  • Linna Oktaviana Sari Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Agusurio Azmi Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Ery Safrianti Universitas Riau, Indonesia
  • Feranita Jalil Universitas Riau, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31258/ijeepse.3.3.94-99
Abstract viewed: 28 times
pdf downloaded: 13 times
Keywords: DSR, routing, TORA, VANET

Abstract

Pekanbaru city is a large area, therefore traffic congestion often occurs due to the density of society’s vehicles. From this problem, it is needed a technology that can exchange information between vehicles. Information Technology that can involve many vehicles with special network types without dependence on an infrastructure is Ad Hoc Network. One type of this network is Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET). VANET is a new concept in enabling communication between Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V). For efficient data packet delivery, VANET requires a routing protocol. In this research, for simulated and analyzed performance is used the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Temporally Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA) protocol. NS-2 is used to simulated a moved nodes, SUMO software is used to simulated real map of SKA Mall crossroad and parameter the quality of performance routing protocol DSR can determined by End to End Delay, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) and Routing Overhead (RO). This simulation uses scenario 100 nodes, 150 nodes, 200 nodes and 250 nodes. The simulation results with the scenario of changing the number of nodes, the DSR routing protocol produces better performance with an average of  End to End Delay is 0.1066 s, average of PDR is 95.45% and average of RO is 1.0076. While the TORA routing protocol has an average of End to End Delay is 0.1163s, average of PDR is 93.49% and average of RO is 1.0801. And in the scenario of node speed changes, the TORA routing protocol produces better performance with an average of End to End Delay is 0.0861 s and average of PDR 97.37%. While the DSR routing protocol is better with an average of RO is 1.0076.

References

[1] Afriana, L. 2013. “Implementasi Dan Analisis Kinerja Routing Protocol B.A.T.M.A.N-Adv (Better Approach To Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking Advanced) Pada Jaringan Berbasis Wireless Mesh”. Skripsi. Universitas Indonesia.

[2] Priyanshu and Maurya, A. K. 2014. Impact of Node Density on the Performance of GSR & TORA Routing Protocols. Faculty of Computer Science Engineering, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University : 251-255

[3] Denatama, M.I. dkk. 2016. Analisis Performansi Kinerja Protocol Routing DSDV dan OLSR Untuk Perubahan Kecepatan Mobilitas pada Standar IEEE 802.11ah. Jurnal Infotel. Vol.8, No.2 : 100-106

[4] Dewi, I.N. dkk. 2016. Simulasi dan Analisis Performansi dari Protocol Routing Berbasis Posisi GPRS dan Gytar Untuk Vehicle Communication pada Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANET). TEKTRIKA, Vol.1, No.1 : 23-31

[5] Dimyati, Mohamad dkk. 2016. Pemilihan Node Rebroadcast untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Protokol Multicast AODV (MAODV) pada VANETS. Surabaya : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi. Vol. 14, No. 2 : 198-206

[6] Kochher, Rajesh dan Mehta, Ritu. 2016. Performance Analysis of Reactive AODV and DSR with Hybrid GRP Routing Protocols under IEEE 802.11g MANET. Computer Science Engineering, DAV Institute of Engineering & Technology Jalandhar, India.

[7] Nutrihadi, Firdaus dkk. 2016. SUMO dan VanetMobisim untuk Implementasi Routing Protocol AODV menggunakan Network Simulator 2 (NS-2). Surabaya : Jurnal Teknik ITS. Vol. 5, No. 1 : 19-24

[8] Kurniawan, Qorie dkk. 2017. Analisis Performansi Protokol Routing TORA dan AOMDV pada MANET. Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Telkom.

[9] Sharma, Ashutosh and Kumar, Rajiv. 2016. Performance Comparison and Detailed Study of AODV, DSDV, DSR, TORA and OLSR Routing Protocol in Ad Hoc Networks. Electronics and Communications Engineering, Jaypee University of Information Technology Solan : 732-736

[10] Rendra. 2016. Analisis Perbandingan Unjuk Kerja Protokol Routing DYMO terhadap Protokol Routing AODV di jaringan VANET. Skripsi. Universitas Sanata Dharma.

[11] Widi, Heribertus dkk. 2014. Analisis Secure-AODV pada VANET Terhadap Serangan Denial of Service (DoS). Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Telkom.

[12] Anisia, Rianda. dkk. 2016. Analisis Performansi Routing Protocol OLSR dan AOMDV pada Jaringan Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET). ISSN, Vol. 5, No. 1

[13] Lugayizi, F. L. dkk. 2016. Comparative Evaluation of QoS Routing in VANET. Computer Science Department, North-West University : 183-188

[14] Said Ali, A. K. and Kulkarni, U. V. 2017. Comparing and Analyzing Reactive Routing Protocols (AODV, DSR and TORA) in QoS of MANET. Computer Science and Engineering SGGS IE & T, SRTM University : 345-348

[15] Yadav,Manoj. dkk. 2015. Multi-Hop Wireless Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocol – A Comparative Study of DSDV, TORA, DSR and AODV. Banaras Hindu University. India

Published
2020-10-13
How to Cite
[1]
L. O. Sari, A. Azmi, E. Safrianti, and F. Jalil, “Performance Analysis of DSR and TORA Model Routing Protocols In Vehicular Ad Hoc Network”, IJEEPSE, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 94-99, Oct. 2020.